View Full Version: Who is better?

sbuk > General Music > Who is better?


Title: Who is better?


Jack - October 20, 2009 09:00 PM (GMT)
oasis or blur

please include reasons

Naaman - October 20, 2009 09:02 PM (GMT)
Oasis. Just stronger songs really!

Emma - October 20, 2009 09:06 PM (GMT)
Oasis.

Though I don't like either of them.

jess - October 20, 2009 09:06 PM (GMT)
Oasis.

Better songs and from Manchester :D

Jack - October 20, 2009 09:09 PM (GMT)
Blur.

Better musicans and Damon is an awesome song writer and pop star.

I Am... Michael Fierce - October 20, 2009 09:17 PM (GMT)
Cheryl

Emma - October 20, 2009 09:19 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (I Am... Michael Fierce @ Oct 20 2009, 10:17 PM)
Cheryl

:lol2: :lol2:

Jack - October 20, 2009 09:24 PM (GMT)
lmao omg i was going to edit the topic to be about cheryl if no one replied within the hour.

Daisy - October 20, 2009 09:33 PM (GMT)
Blur.

I don't know the full work of either but I listen to several of Blur's songs and none of Oasis's. They're not bad I just find them quite dull. Blur have some more fun songs.

Naaman - October 20, 2009 09:35 PM (GMT)
Wonderwall :wub: :wub: :wub:

Jack - October 20, 2009 09:43 PM (GMT)
< Tender

:yes:

jess - October 20, 2009 09:46 PM (GMT)
Slide Away
Half The World Away
Don't Look Back In Anger
Little By Little
The Masterplan
Champagne Supernova

:wub:

Daisy - October 20, 2009 09:53 PM (GMT)
Charmless Man
Country House
Girls & Boys
Parklife
Coffee and TV
There's No Other Way

:wub:

Coked Up Baby Boy - October 20, 2009 10:12 PM (GMT)
theyre both shit.

Daisy - October 20, 2009 10:18 PM (GMT)
^Music snob.

Karen - October 21, 2009 04:48 AM (GMT)
Well they ARE both shit!

KOS - October 21, 2009 05:43 AM (GMT)
Both are shit to the highest extreme.. Tho I do like Coffee and TV, so I guess Blur...

Karen - October 21, 2009 06:21 AM (GMT)
Oasis are like a second-rate Beatles tribute band withiut the harmonies.
Blur are like a load of smarty-pants trying to be cool. But after that "Chant" thing, I just hated them. I hate anybody that uses "Woooo Hooooo" instead of lyrics.

Youngster - October 21, 2009 07:27 AM (GMT)
Oasis by far! They're songs are so iconic in the UK. Champagane Supernova, Wonderwall, Stop Crying Your Heart Out, Little By Little, Roll With It... :wub:

Although Blur were amazing at T in the Park this year.

Jack - October 21, 2009 07:40 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Karen @ Oct 21 2009, 06:21 AM)
Oasis are like a second-rate Beatles tribute band withiut the harmonies.
Blur are like a load of smarty-pants trying to be cool. But after that "Chant" thing, I just hated them. I hate anybody that uses "Woooo Hooooo" instead of lyrics.

omg karen i love u x they tried so hard to be the beatles (so much so they employed ringo star's son to be their drummer) but in what...nearly 20 years they couldn't manage to create the amount of iconic and timeless songs the beatles created in like what seven years? plus their cover of helter skelter is shit and really shows how weak they are. plus noel and liam are massive twats. At least Blur progressed their sound away from the britpop shit with Blur, 13 and think tank while Oasis were doing the same ol' working class for as long as they could get away with it and then did a contrivied ~psychedelic~ influence album much like the Beatles did after they went to India. They're so rubbish

Karen - October 22, 2009 01:28 AM (GMT)
Even if their music had been interesting and orginal, I couldn't stand Liam's John Lennon impersonation. At least John Lennon had that "arrogant" stare because he was so f@cking short-sighted he couldn't see the audience! Liam is just.... an arrogant tw@t!




Hosted for free by InvisionFree