Title: This scares me almost more
Couchpotato - November 5, 2009 08:18 PM (GMT)
than anything else I've read in a long time.
| QUOTE |
75 Percent of Young Americans Are Unfit for Military Duty
Posted: 11/3/09 WASHINGTON (Nov. 3) -- Are America's youth too fat, dumb or dishonest to defend the nation against its enemies?
The latest Army statistics show a stunning 75 percent of military-age youth are ineligible to join the military because they are overweight, can't pass entrance exams, have dropped out of high school or had run-ins with the law.
So many young people between the prime recruiting ages of 17 and 24 cannot meet minimum standards that a group of retired military leaders is calling for more investment in early childhood education to combat the insidious effects of junk food and inadequate education.
"We've never had this problem of young people being obese like we have today," said Gen. John Shalikashvili, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
He calls the rising number of youth unfit for duty a matter of national security. "We should be concerned about how this will impact this overstretched Army and its ability to recruit."
Shalikashvili is among dozens of retired generals, admirals and civilian Pentagon officials who have banded together as Mission Readiness: Military Leaders for Kids. The group, which includes former NATO commander and presidential candidate Wesley Clark, will appear with Secretary of Education Arne Duncan at the National Press Club on Thursday to urge immediate action to reduce dropout rates and improve the physical and moral fitness of the nation's youth.
They will cite research that shows quality early childhood education raises graduation rates by up to 44 percent and reduces the odds of being arrested for a violent crime by age 18.
Douglas Smith of the U.S. Army Recruiting Command said 2008 data shows about three in 10 youths have an initial barrier to enlistment.
Most aren't insurmountable. "If you're overweight, we tell you to come back when you've lost the weight. If you don't score well on the armed forces aptitude test, we suggest you study and take it again," he said.
Between 2004 and 2008, the Army more than doubled the number of "conduct" waivers it granted to would-be soldiers with criminal or misdemeanor records. The loosened standards proved necessary in a time of war and amid a booming economy that forced military recruiters to work overtime to fill the ranks.
The new warnings about a generation of couch potatoes comes just weeks after the Pentagon announced its best recruiting year since the all-volunteer force began in 1974. The economic meltdown and rising unemployment, combined with bigger military bonuses and benefits, enticed hundreds of thousands to enlist despite the inevitability most would be sent to war.
The plethora of would-be recruits allowed the military services to be choosier after years of taking in more high school dropouts and those needing extra physical training to meet weight requirements.
Recruiting may have gotten easier, but "the good times don't stay forever," warned David Segal, a University of Maryland military sociologist. When the economy recovers and young people are able to get jobs or can afford to go to college, the military will be faced with the same out-of-shape, ill-prepared pool of recruits as before.
"Recruiting will get tough again," he said. "The trend line is clear: The youth population is getting less healthy."
|
Hopefully this trend does not continue. A nation unable or unwilling to defend itself is doomed.
Clarence Boddicker - November 5, 2009 08:19 PM (GMT)
Bill Maher WAS right about Americans. I don't know why people gave him so much shit about what he said. He was 100% correct.
AMERICA is great. It's Americans that stink.
Kali Maa - November 5, 2009 08:20 PM (GMT)
Who cares about "defending America"... lately that hasn't meant what it says AT ALL.
It's the fact that these children are unhealthy that's disturbing.
Gabecpa - November 5, 2009 08:26 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 5 2009, 02:20 PM) |
| Who cares about "defending America"... |
...
Couchpotato - November 5, 2009 08:27 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
Who cares about "defending America"... lately that hasn't meant what it says AT ALL.
It's the fact that these children are unhealthy that's disturbing.
|
Easy to say when it isnt your job to do so I guess. Personally I dont have the luxury and must pass the torch to these kids at some point, which scares me. Whether you believe it or not our military keeps this country safe regardless of what you think of the missions they are given. The military doesnt get to pick which wars it fights.
Kali Maa - November 5, 2009 08:28 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Gabecpa @ Nov 5 2009, 02:26 PM) |
| ... |
It's in quotes, internet dater...
Kali Maa - November 5, 2009 08:28 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 5 2009, 02:27 PM) |
| Easy to say when it isnt your job to do so I guess. Personally I dont have the luxury and must pass the torch to these kids at some point, which scares me. Whether you believe it or not our military keeps this country safe regardless of what you think of the missions they are given. The military doesnt get to pick which wars it fights. |
At this point we've neither "defended America" in Iraq OR Afghanistan.
Couchpotato - November 5, 2009 08:34 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
At this point we've neither "defended America" in Iraq OR Afghanistan.
|
Are you being intentionally stupid/attempting to make this thread some indictment on the operations in Iraq/Afghan? I'm not talking about nor do I wish to argue with you over those specific missions as that's not the point of this thread. The fact that our youth is either too dumb, too fat or too morally bankrupt to serve in our nations armed forces is. What you think of the OIF/OEF doesnt factor into the fact that the US Military keeps this country safe.
Kali Maa - November 5, 2009 08:37 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 5 2009, 02:34 PM) |
| Are you being intentionally stupid/attempting to make this thread some indictment on the operations in Iraq/Afghan? I'm not talking about nor do I wish to argue with you over those specific missions as that's not the point of this thread. The fact that our youth is either too dumb, too fat or too morally bankrupt to serve in our nations armed forces is. What you think of the OIF/OEF doesnt factor into the fact that the US Military keeps this country safe. |
I apologize, CP. I didn't realize that you were on your period and felt like being a bitch.
Regardless, my point stands. You see our nations children as "future defenders of America", while I see THE CHILD. It's not all about the job YOU picked. Their health is important whether they choose to join the military or NOT.
So, their health's state is SAD.
...and yes, both wars are fucked up and I'm not really concerned whether you care to discuss it or not. It's a point I'm making. America hasn't needed to be "defended" for some time now. Get off your military high horse.
Gabecpa - November 5, 2009 08:37 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 5 2009, 02:34 PM) |
| our youth is either too dumb, too fat or too morally bankrupt to serve in our nations armed forces |
qft
DR_PostingBillboard - November 5, 2009 08:52 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 5 2009, 04:37 PM) |
I apologize, CP. I didn't realize that you were on your period and felt like being a bitch.
Regardless, my point stands. You see our nations children as "future defenders of America", while I see THE CHILD. It's not all about the job YOU picked. Their health is important whether they choose to join the military or NOT. So, their health's state is SAD.
...and yes, both wars are fucked up and I'm not really concerned whether you care to discuss it or not. It's a point I'm making. America hasn't needed to be "defended" for some time now. Get off your military high horse. |
Do me a favor and shut up about asians eating dogs. K? Nobody cares about that.
ComandantePepsi - November 5, 2009 08:53 PM (GMT)
I think the military should accept more fat kids. It would be a good way to cull the herd.
ComandantePepsi - November 5, 2009 08:55 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 5 2009, 12:34 PM) |
| QUOTE | At this point we've neither "defended America" in Iraq OR Afghanistan.
|
Are you being intentionally stupid/attempting to make this thread some indictment on the operations in Iraq/Afghan? I'm not talking about nor do I wish to argue with you over those specific missions as that's not the point of this thread. The fact that our youth is either too dumb, too fat or too morally bankrupt to serve in our nations armed forces is. What you think of the OIF/OEF doesnt factor into the fact that the US Military keeps this country safe.
|
Geography keeps America safe - the military props up friendly dictators and expands Uncle Sam's decaying economic empire.
Couchpotato - November 5, 2009 09:05 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
I apologize, CP. I didn't realize that you were on your period and felt like being a bitch.
Regardless, my point stands. You see our nations children as "future defenders of America", while I see THE CHILD. It's not all about the job YOU picked. Their health is important whether they choose to join the military or NOT. So, their health's state is SAD.
...and yes, both wars are fucked up and I'm not really concerned whether you care to discuss it or not. It's a point I'm making. America hasn't needed to be "defended" for some time now. Get off your military high horse.
|
I guess I just fail to see what your opinion of OIF/OEF has to do with what the article is talking about. Specifically that 75% of the nations youth is ineligible because of their lack of physical fitness/education/law enforcement involvement before they even get to make the choice of whether to serve their nation, and what impact that will have on our nations future. Maybe you can clarify that for me. BTW I already knew you didnt agree with our presence there so no need to expound on that point.
Kali Maa - November 5, 2009 09:28 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (DR_PostingBillboard @ Nov 5 2009, 02:52 PM) |
| Do me a favor and shut up about asians eating dogs. K? Nobody cares about that. |
Right. 'Cause what I said what to "shut up". :logik:
Kali Maa - November 5, 2009 09:29 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 5 2009, 03:05 PM) |
| I guess I just fail to see what your opinion of OIF/OEF has to do with what the article is talking about. Specifically that 75% of the nations youth is ineligible because of their lack of physical fitness/education/law enforcement involvement before they even get to make the choice of whether to serve their nation, and what impact that will have on our nations future. Maybe you can clarify that for me. BTW I already knew you didnt agree with our presence there so no need to expound on that point. |
My point is that you and the article don't actually seem to give a shit about the health of America's youth, but rather the idea that they become fit SO THAT they can serve in the military.
Couchpotato - November 5, 2009 11:21 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 5 2009, 09:29 PM) |
| My point is that you and the article don't actually seem to give a shit about the health of America's youth, but rather the idea that they become fit SO THAT they can serve in the military. |
In this context yes. My greater concern is that as a country will be unable to defend ourselves in the future because of the lack of fitness/education/inability to abide by the law, of our youth. It's a sad commentary on the overall condition of the youth of this country.
You on the other hand seem to want to turn this into "who cares, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, blah blah blah" which has nothing to do with the overall health of our youth whether they choose to serve or not.
Couchpotato - November 6, 2009 12:39 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| ...and yes, both wars are fucked up and I'm not really concerned whether you care to discuss it or not. It's a point I'm making. America hasn't needed to be "defended" for some time now. Get off your military high horse. |
The reason you believe that "America has not needed defending" shows you are either naive or just willfully blind. You have that luxury I guess. Not to go all Col Jessup on you but
"Son, we live in a world that has walls and those walls need to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines; you have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives and that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use then as the backbone of a life trying to defend something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you," and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest that you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to. "
:B):
Kali Maa - November 6, 2009 05:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 5 2009, 05:21 PM) |
In this context yes. My greater concern is that as a country will be unable to defend ourselves in the future because of the lack of fitness/education/inability to abide by the law, of our youth. It's a sad commentary on the overall condition of the youth of this country.
You on the other hand seem to want to turn this into "who cares, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, blah blah blah" which has nothing to do with the overall health of our youth whether they choose to serve or not. |
No. I'm not "turning this into" anything.
I've openly stated my opinion on your article and it's focus in regard to children's health. Your opinion shows absolutely no interest in the children for the children's sake, but rather because they are apparently you hope they'll shape up to become tools to "defend America".
When I put quotes around "defend America", it's because I don't view any recent/current war to live up to that definition, regardless that you need to make YOURSELF believe it for whatever reason.
Kali Maa - November 6, 2009 05:35 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 5 2009, 06:39 PM) |
The reason you believe that "America has not needed defending" shows you are either naive or just willfully blind. You have that luxury I guess. Not to go all Col Jessup on you but
"Son, we live in a world that has walls and those walls need to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines; you have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives and that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use then as the backbone of a life trying to defend something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you," and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest that you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to. "
:B): |
I don't know what that comes from, but it doesn't hold any water in regard to my views.
I've never knocked down the military. I've always looked at the individual.
Nor have I thought it right that we continue sending people to war to die NEEDLESSLY.
I don't get the whole 'puffing out your chest to prove something' thing... maybe because I'm a woman and don't have any ego issues. Then again, neither do any of the men in my life have that problem... probably because they're not insecure.
So, keep puffing out your feathers and feeling as though your job is the only important job... the most important job.
While you're at it, I hope you're telling the garbage man, "thank you" everyday, for removing your trash. Without him, your lot would stink.
Couchpotato - November 7, 2009 02:04 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 6 2009, 05:31 PM) |
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 5 2009, 05:21 PM) | In this context yes. My greater concern is that as a country will be unable to defend ourselves in the future because of the lack of fitness/education/inability to abide by the law, of our youth. It's a sad commentary on the overall condition of the youth of this country.
You on the other hand seem to want to turn this into "who cares, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, blah blah blah" which has nothing to do with the overall health of our youth whether they choose to serve or not. |
No. I'm not "turning this into" anything.
I've openly stated my opinion on your article and it's focus in regard to children's health. Your opinion shows absolutely no interest in the children for the children's sake, but rather because they are apparently you hope they'll shape up to become tools to "defend America".
When I put quotes around "defend America", it's because I don't view any recent/current war to live up to that definition, regardless that you need to make YOURSELF believe it for whatever reason.
|
Yes you are. If not why even bring up OIF/OEF? What does that have to do with the conversation?
My concern is most definitely about the health and well being of our youth, and certainly about their ability to defend our nation in the future. The fact that you are not concerned a bit scary in and of itself. I hope that you are in the minority. The simple fact is, while you may not want to believe it, we need a certain percentage of our youth to be willing and able to take up arms against those that threaten us. If we cant find those that will or that are able this country is in deeper trouble than I think you are willing to believe. If you believe otherwise, you my friend, are bat shit crazy.
anditsgood - November 7, 2009 02:37 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 5 2009, 03:37 PM) |
I apologize, CP. I didn't realize that you were on your period and felt like being a bitch.
Regardless, my point stands. You see our nations children as "future defenders of America", while I see THE CHILD. It's not all about the job YOU picked. Their health is important whether they choose to join the military or NOT. So, their health's state is SAD.
...and yes, both wars are fucked up and I'm not really concerned whether you care to discuss it or not. It's a point I'm making. America hasn't needed to be "defended" for some time now. Get off your military high horse. |
isnt it one of the same, you know,samantics.....
but hey what do i know
Couchpotato - November 7, 2009 02:52 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (anditsgood @ Nov 7 2009, 02:37 PM) |
| QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 5 2009, 03:37 PM) | I apologize, CP. I didn't realize that you were on your period and felt like being a bitch.
Regardless, my point stands. You see our nations children as "future defenders of America", while I see THE CHILD. It's not all about the job YOU picked. Their health is important whether they choose to join the military or NOT. So, their health's state is SAD.
...and yes, both wars are fucked up and I'm not really concerned whether you care to discuss it or not. It's a point I'm making. America hasn't needed to be "defended" for some time now. Get off your military high horse. |
isnt it one of the same, you know,samantics.....
but hey what do i know
|
Yeah pretty much, but Kali wanted to turn this thread into another OIF/OEF bitch session.
anditsgood - November 7, 2009 02:54 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 7 2009, 09:52 AM) |
| QUOTE (anditsgood @ Nov 7 2009, 02:37 PM) | | QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 5 2009, 03:37 PM) | I apologize, CP. I didn't realize that you were on your period and felt like being a bitch.
Regardless, my point stands. You see our nations children as "future defenders of America", while I see THE CHILD. It's not all about the job YOU picked. Their health is important whether they choose to join the military or NOT. So, their health's state is SAD.
...and yes, both wars are fucked up and I'm not really concerned whether you care to discuss it or not. It's a point I'm making. America hasn't needed to be "defended" for some time now. Get off your military high horse. |
isnt it one of the same, you know,samantics.....
but hey what do i know
|
Yeah pretty much, but Kali wanted to turn this thread into another OIF/OEF bitch session.
|
naw
she just felt she had to defend her team mates
joetheismansleg - November 7, 2009 03:15 PM (GMT)
kali is a despicable cunt. :whistle:
Just Plain Bill - November 7, 2009 03:43 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 6 2009, 01:35 PM) |
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 5 2009, 06:39 PM) | The reason you believe that "America has not needed defending" shows you are either naive or just willfully blind. You have that luxury I guess. Not to go all Col Jessup on you but
"Son, we live in a world that has walls and those walls need to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines; you have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives and that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use then as the backbone of a life trying to defend something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you," and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest that you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to. "
:B): |
I don't know what that comes from, but it doesn't hold any water in regard to my views.
I've never knocked down the military. I've always looked at the individual. Nor have I thought it right that we continue sending people to war to die NEEDLESSLY.
I don't get the whole 'puffing out your chest to prove something' thing... maybe because I'm a woman and don't have any ego issues. Then again, neither do any of the men in my life have that problem... probably because they're not insecure.
So, keep puffing out your feathers and feeling as though your job is the only important job... the most important job.
While you're at it, I hope you're telling the garbage man, "thank you" everyday, for removing your trash. Without him, your lot would stink.
|
| QUOTE |
| I don't know what that comes from, |
Jeez Louise.
[dohtml]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hopNAI8Pefg&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hopNAI8Pefg&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/dohtml]
Kali Maa - November 7, 2009 08:20 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 7 2009, 08:04 AM) |
Yes you are. If not why even bring up OIF/OEF? What does that have to do with the conversation?
My concern is most definitely about the health and well being of our youth, and certainly about their ability to defend our nation in the future. The fact that you are not concerned a bit scary in and of itself. I hope that you are in the minority. The simple fact is, while you may not want to believe it, we need a certain percentage of our youth to be willing and able to take up arms against those that threaten us. If we cant find those that will or that are able this country is in deeper trouble than I think you are willing to believe. If you believe otherwise, you my friend, are bat shit crazy. |
I brought them up because the men and women fighting and even dying in both those wars, signed up to "Defend America".
My point still stands. I'm concerned about the health of the children FOR THE SAKE of the health of the children.
You're concerned with the health of the children for the sake of hoping they'll join the military and "defend America". :logik:
Kali Maa - November 7, 2009 08:21 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (anditsgood @ Nov 7 2009, 08:37 AM) |
isnt it one of the same, you know,samantics.....
but hey what do i know |
You know what semantics means, as well as you know how to spell it. :D
Kali Maa - November 7, 2009 08:23 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Just Plain Bill @ Nov 7 2009, 09:43 AM) |
Jeez Louise.
[dohtml]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hopNAI8Pefg&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hopNAI8Pefg&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/dohtml] |
Oh, I see. Thanks Bill.
I'm sure that character in that movie had every "Conservative" male's panties moist. :lol:
Couchpotato - November 7, 2009 08:46 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 7 2009, 08:20 PM) |
| QUOTE (Couchpotato @ Nov 7 2009, 08:04 AM) | Yes you are. If not why even bring up OIF/OEF? What does that have to do with the conversation?
My concern is most definitely about the health and well being of our youth, and certainly about their ability to defend our nation in the future. The fact that you are not concerned a bit scary in and of itself. I hope that you are in the minority. The simple fact is, while you may not want to believe it, we need a certain percentage of our youth to be willing and able to take up arms against those that threaten us. If we cant find those that will or that are able this country is in deeper trouble than I think you are willing to believe. If you believe otherwise, you my friend, are bat shit crazy. |
I brought them up because the men and women fighting and even dying in both those wars, signed up to "Defend America".
My point still stands. I'm concerned about the health of the children FOR THE SAKE of the health of the children.
You're concerned with the health of the children for the sake of hoping they'll join the military and "defend America". :logik:
|
That isnt even close to what I said Kali. The point is that 75% of our youth is currently ineligible before they get to make the choice. Of course I have a vested interest in this, I've worked in the field my entire life, so I would like to think there will be someone there who is qualified to take my place when I leave.
As far as the military defending America if you dont understand that regardless of OIF/OEF the US Military most certainly defends this nation you are just stupid.
anditsgood - November 7, 2009 10:33 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Kali Maa @ Nov 7 2009, 03:21 PM) |
| QUOTE (anditsgood @ Nov 7 2009, 08:37 AM) | isnt it one of the same, you know,samantics.....
but hey what do i know |
You know what semantics means, as well as you know how to spell it. :D
|
why shoud i learn how to spell something when i have my own personal spell checker here
gosh kali, how do i get as much meaning in my life as you have being the boards spell checker