View Full Version: Just turned on the election results....

Political Deathmatch > Politics > Just turned on the election results....


Title: Just turned on the election results....


Bucky7 - November 4, 2009 02:15 AM (GMT)
....has USTA been accounted for tonight? :unsure:

ComandantePepsi - November 4, 2009 02:54 AM (GMT)
USTA is the kind of guy who thinks Creigh Deeds is a good candidate. He's probably swinging from a beam right now.


Brooks was here

So was USTA!

Willieisdead - November 4, 2009 03:01 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (ComandantePepsi @ Nov 4 2009, 02:54 AM)
USTA is the kind of guy who thinks Creigh Deeds is a good candidate. He's probably swinging from a beam right now.


Brooks was here

So was USTA!

:lol:

Willieisdead - November 4, 2009 03:04 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
Not a Projection of Christie's Victory, Just Math

Sean Trende at RealClearPolitics might have the most key revelation of the hour: "Corzine would have to carry the rest of the state with about 53 percent of the two-party vote in order to sweep the state. With most of the heavily Democrat areas half in, this seems unlikely."


I realize our resident stats expert isn't here to explain all this for us, but I'll go out on a limb and just say that, while mathematically possible, is not at all likely.

Corzine's goose could be cooked...


Clarence Boddicker - November 4, 2009 06:09 AM (GMT)
Pepsi with the Shawshank Redemption quote for the win.

Nice.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree