Title: Orlando Nude in Troy?
Description: Strong Language
KimiBloom - February 20, 2004 01:46 AM (GMT)
Get your tissues ready, girls! Let the drooling commence! :drool:
This is a little 'drabble' I snipped from a review of Troy, excellent MOST excellent review, a bit of harsh language and sexual undertone, and one unnecessary jab at Orli, but truly funny and worth a look:
But the real question is: this little paragraph hints at some 'pubic hair flashes of Orli' can it be TRUE?????
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=17009Speaking of fighting...remember how Warner said they wanted PG-13? Well, there is no way in hell this movie is PG-13, with all of the spurting blood, staffs through the head, stabbings, hangings, and all around bloody fighting, not to mention the pubic revelations of both Pitt and Orlando Bloom and the sweet, sweet, amazingly scrumptious, yummy yummy yummy tits and ass of Diane Jruger....hot damn! That girl looks good naked! Anyway, there will be some major trimming if they don't expect the R rating. HURRY MAY 14th...Hurry PLEASE! :woot: :yum:
.JuLEs. - February 20, 2004 03:45 AM (GMT)
Gawsh, I wish. But I seem to be having a hard time believing that, with the crudeness of the review and all...
| QUOTE |
| tits and ass of Diane Jruger....hot damn! |
:huh: :urgh:
Plus, I don't believe Orlando would show his, er, manliness on big screen. But we can hope.
Ryvyan - February 20, 2004 04:20 AM (GMT)
Actually I doubt he would reveal all partly because of the fans he attracts; mostly young girls who thinks that the man is innocent (reminds me of a thread in Ka-Bloom!). Maybe a stunt double?
Or maybe it's their armpit hair.
:lmao:
But I can certainly hope that if he really bares some in the movie, the cinemas here would release it as a rating not beyond my age. There're PG, NC-16, M-18 (it's new, starting next month!) and R(A) (for 21 years and beyond). Maybe Troy would have a chance at M-18 or even a NC-17 (for mild nudity) if Orlando, Brad or Diane are going to reveal some. Ok, my mind is straying...
KimiBloom - February 20, 2004 06:17 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| Or maybe it's their armpit hair. |
:lmao:
THAT is a brilliant deduction PP!
Ryvyan - February 21, 2004 02:42 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (KimiBloom @ Feb 21 2004, 02:17 AM) |
| QUOTE | | Or maybe it's their armpit hair. |
:lmao:
THAT is a brilliant deduction PP!
|
*curtsies*
The more I think about it, the less likely Orlando would strip for it. Pahh, I don't know...
Cleopatra (queen of kitsch) - February 22, 2004 07:32 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
Oh, and about Legolas...yeah, he is entirely pointless. Ignore the third billing. Aside from setting the story in motion in the beginning, Bloom is hardly in the movie. He serves no purpose. He is set dressing at the least and a plot devise at the best. Twice in the film his actions set up the storyline for the other characters but leave him with nothing to do. It is a thankless role. In fact, his character and relationship with the the other characters in the film is its biggest fault. Hopefully they'll trim a bit of him from the movie. Him, and the whiny little brat who plays Achilles' cousin and essentially creates the reason Achilles fights the Trojans. You know how it works, the same thing that's been done to death before: younger character idolizes older stronger character, picks a fight, comes back dead, and viola! Motivation and emotional response for the lead character.)
|
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
sorry love
sounds like all the chocolate-lovers will be very dissapointed this may :tsk:
got a lovely legshotpicture because of this movie anyway
made it already worth existing
KimiBloom - February 24, 2004 11:50 PM (GMT)
Yea...I think this may have been more wishfull thinking than truth...*sigh*
But a glimps...just a tiny little glimpse...would be nice :yum:
*le grrrroooowl*