Title: Is Pluto still a planet in your heart?
Description: overkill by me but i don't care
sir matchstickmen - September 2, 2006 07:06 PM (GMT)
sir matchstickmen - September 2, 2006 07:14 PM (GMT)
what b***ard voted no? roflmao
You heartless bugger, do you not realise how lonely poor little innocent Pluto is going to be now he has been cut off from his bigger brothers? :(
ignorant swine :angry:
roflmao roflmao roflmao
SerenaW19 - September 2, 2006 07:23 PM (GMT)
Don't hold back will you roflmao
sir matchstickmen - September 2, 2006 07:25 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Sep 2 2006, 08:23 PM) |
| Don't hold back will you roflmao |
nope roflmao
*sings*
:whistle:
You'd sit alone, in all that night
Too far away from the sunlight
And ev'rything you had to know
you had to find it on your own
We found you in amongst the stars
With telescopes as big as Mars
A new planet to put in our log
You even were a cartoon dog
So don't become some background rock
That all the other planets will mock
They just won't know or just won't care
But they'll notice, when you're not there
You had your time you had the power
You've yet to have your finest hour
Plu-u-to
All we hear is Plu-u-to ga ga
Plu-u-to goo goo
Plu-u-to ga ga
All we hear is Plu-u-to ga ga
Plu-u-to blah blah
Plu-u-to was cool
Plu-u-to someone still loves you
We read the books - we scour the stars
With telescopes for hours and hours
We looked for you, so far away
The ninth planet comes into play...
Let's hope you never leave old friend
Don't let this news, send you round the bend
So stick around cos we will listen
When we grow tired of this definition ( roflmao )
You had your time you had the power
You've yet to have your finest hour
Plu-u-to
All we hear is Plu-u-to ga ga
Plu-u-to goo goo
Plu-u-to ga ga
All we hear is Plu-u-to ga ga
Plu-u-to blah blah
Plu-u-to was cool
Plu-u-to someone still loves you
Plu-u-to ga ga
Plu-u-to ga ga
Plu-u-to ga ga
You had your time you had the power
You've yet to have your finest hour
Plu-u-to
ivokarlovicfan - September 2, 2006 07:27 PM (GMT)
isnt pluto, mickey mouses dog?
sir matchstickmen - September 2, 2006 07:27 PM (GMT)
2 miserable buggers now!
or was it my singing roflmao
sir matchstickmen - September 2, 2006 07:28 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ivokarlovicfan @ Sep 2 2006, 08:27 PM) |
| isnt pluto, mickey mouses dog? |
named after the "ex-planet" :)
sir matchstickmen - September 3, 2006 05:23 PM (GMT)
you're about as decisive as the scientists! roflmao
Silver - September 3, 2006 06:25 PM (GMT)
Pluto's a planet in my heart. :)
Big Al - September 3, 2006 06:57 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Silver @ Sep 3 2006, 07:25 PM) |
| Pluto's a planet in my heart. :) |
It is to me as well. Love the name .
SuperBRAT - September 3, 2006 07:12 PM (GMT)
What did they reclassify it as? A small or minor planet or something?
I love the name too, but Apos's favourite planet is Uranus, cos he talks out of his! roflmao
I feel sorry for those for whom Pluto is a rulign planet in astrology! Luckily mien si Jupiter so that's okay then ;)
sir matchstickmen - September 4, 2006 08:39 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 3 2006, 08:12 PM) |
What did they reclassify it as? A small or minor planet or something?
I love the name too, but Apos's favourite planet is Uranus, cos he talks out of his! roflmao
I feel sorry for those for whom Pluto is a rulign planet in astrology! Luckily mien si Jupiter so that's okay then ;) |
I think they stripped it of everything - really it's just an asteroid now :(
SuperBRAT - September 4, 2006 09:46 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 4 2006, 08:39 AM) |
| QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 3 2006, 08:12 PM) | What did they reclassify it as? A small or minor planet or something?
I love the name too, but Apos's favourite planet is Uranus, cos he talks out of his! roflmao
I feel sorry for those for whom Pluto is a rulign planet in astrology! Luckily mien si Jupiter so that's okay then ;) |
I think they stripped it of everything - really it's just an asteroid now :(
|
I read about it last night - it is a dwarf planet! Di dyou knwo that they were going to mak eone of it's moons and another object new planets, but they had a total u-tirn and decided not to do that and also strip Pluto of it's status? roflmao
sir matchstickmen - September 5, 2006 08:59 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 4 2006, 10:46 PM) |
| QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 4 2006, 08:39 AM) | | QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 3 2006, 08:12 PM) | What did they reclassify it as? A small or minor planet or something?
I love the name too, but Apos's favourite planet is Uranus, cos he talks out of his! roflmao
I feel sorry for those for whom Pluto is a rulign planet in astrology! Luckily mien si Jupiter so that's okay then ;) |
I think they stripped it of everything - really it's just an asteroid now :(
|
I read about it last night - it is a dwarf planet! Di dyou knwo that they were going to mak eone of it's moons and another object new planets, but they had a total u-tirn and decided not to do that and also strip Pluto of it's status? roflmao
|
Yeah I did, it's moon sort of foms a 'double planet' - they revolve around each other! roflmao
The new object (Popularly referred to as Sedna) was going to be a new planet, so was the largest asteroid in the asteroid belt, Ceres, which would have been ridiculous because it's is absolutely tiny!
'Dwarf planet' is one of these stupid silly astronomers names for something when they've initially got something wrong! roflmao
SuperBRAT - September 5, 2006 01:45 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 5 2006, 08:59 AM) |
| QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 4 2006, 10:46 PM) | | QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 4 2006, 08:39 AM) | | QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 3 2006, 08:12 PM) | What did they reclassify it as? A small or minor planet or something?
I love the name too, but Apos's favourite planet is Uranus, cos he talks out of his! roflmao
I feel sorry for those for whom Pluto is a rulign planet in astrology! Luckily mien si Jupiter so that's okay then ;) |
I think they stripped it of everything - really it's just an asteroid now :(
|
I read about it last night - it is a dwarf planet! Di dyou knwo that they were going to mak eone of it's moons and another object new planets, but they had a total u-tirn and decided not to do that and also strip Pluto of it's status? roflmao
|
Yeah I did, it's moon sort of foms a 'double planet' - they revolve around each other! roflmao
The new object (Popularly referred to as Sedna) was going to be a new planet, so was the largest asteroid in the asteroid belt, Ceres, which would have been ridiculous because it's is absolutely tiny!
'Dwarf planet' is one of these stupid silly astronomers names for something when they've initially got something wrong! roflmao
|
roflmao I know, it sounds like they do not know their arses form their elbows if you ask me! roflmao And it took them 76 years to work out their "error"! That poor bloke who discovered it did so in 1930! What a bunch of dynmaic fast moving decision makers they are! roflmao
SerenaW19 - September 5, 2006 02:55 PM (GMT)
That's astronomers for you roflmao
The earth can fully rotate around the centre of the galaxy before they know what they're looking at roflmao
sir matchstickmen - September 6, 2006 09:53 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 5 2006, 02:45 PM) |
| QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 5 2006, 08:59 AM) | | QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 4 2006, 10:46 PM) | | QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 4 2006, 08:39 AM) | | QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 3 2006, 08:12 PM) | What did they reclassify it as? A small or minor planet or something?
I love the name too, but Apos's favourite planet is Uranus, cos he talks out of his! roflmao
I feel sorry for those for whom Pluto is a rulign planet in astrology! Luckily mien si Jupiter so that's okay then ;) |
I think they stripped it of everything - really it's just an asteroid now :(
|
I read about it last night - it is a dwarf planet! Di dyou knwo that they were going to mak eone of it's moons and another object new planets, but they had a total u-tirn and decided not to do that and also strip Pluto of it's status? roflmao
|
Yeah I did, it's moon sort of foms a 'double planet' - they revolve around each other! roflmao
The new object (Popularly referred to as Sedna) was going to be a new planet, so was the largest asteroid in the asteroid belt, Ceres, which would have been ridiculous because it's is absolutely tiny!
'Dwarf planet' is one of these stupid silly astronomers names for something when they've initially got something wrong! roflmao
|
roflmao I know, it sounds like they do not know their arses form their elbows if you ask me! roflmao And it took them 76 years to work out their "error"! That poor bloke who discovered it did so in 1930! What a bunch of dynmaic fast moving decision makers they are! roflmao
|
Hey don't be too critical of 'us' astronomers! roflmao
It took us just 12 years to get a man on the moon since the launch of the first space mission :D
And I suppose in 'our' defense, Space is one of those things that is infinite - we will always find new things, and we will never fully understand everything or know where everything is! :D
What gets me is that it took them so long to decided to send a mission to 'the final planet' that's it has been downgraded by the time they sent it! roflmao
sir matchstickmen - September 6, 2006 09:54 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Sep 5 2006, 03:55 PM) |
That's astronomers for you roflmao
The earth can fully rotate around the centre of the galaxy before they know what they're looking at roflmao |
Oi! Cheeky scamp! roflmao
When I am head of NASA and own 20 ferrari's, 15 homes, 5 luxury yachts and half of leicester, you'll have a different attitude then roflmao
SuperBRAT - September 6, 2006 09:44 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 6 2006, 09:54 AM) |
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Sep 5 2006, 03:55 PM) | That's astronomers for you roflmao
The earth can fully rotate around the centre of the galaxy before they know what they're looking at roflmao |
Oi! Cheeky scamp! roflmao
When I am head of NASA and own 20 ferrari's, 15 homes, 5 luxury yachts and half of leicester, you'll have a different attitude then roflmao
|
Sure will! I will be your wife ;) roflmao
Are you an astronomer then? Do you REALLY belive they put men on the moon when Armstrong went? I don't. I think it was shot in Area 42 or whatever they call it liek the conspiracy theorists say. Was there also not a problem with the light and the way the flag blew, or didn't?
SuperBRAT - September 6, 2006 09:44 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Sep 5 2006, 02:55 PM) |
That's astronomers for you roflmao
The earth can fully rotate around the centre of the galaxy before they know what they're looking at roflmao |
roflmao Nice!
sir matchstickmen - September 7, 2006 10:49 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 6 2006, 10:44 PM) |
| QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 6 2006, 09:54 AM) | | QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Sep 5 2006, 03:55 PM) | That's astronomers for you roflmao
The earth can fully rotate around the centre of the galaxy before they know what they're looking at roflmao |
Oi! Cheeky scamp! roflmao
When I am head of NASA and own 20 ferrari's, 15 homes, 5 luxury yachts and half of leicester, you'll have a different attitude then roflmao
|
Sure will! I will be your wife ;) roflmao
Are you an astronomer then? Do you REALLY belive they put men on the moon when Armstrong went? I don't. I think it was shot in Area 42 or whatever they call it liek the conspiracy theorists say. Was there also not a problem with the light and the way the flag blew, or didn't?
|
roflmao I remember watching that documentary on Channel 5 about that - I found it hilarious!
Man definitely landed on the moon, the thing that fuels these conspiracy theories most is of course the political reasons for going there by the Americans.
The best evidence is the moon rock they brought back - There are compounds in that that are not found anywhere on Earth, while at the same time there are also compounds in it that prove thgat the moon was formed by a collision between the Earth and another large object! roflmao
We actually got shown some rocks that the public don't get shown at the National Space Centre (or the beehive as leicester people call it roflmao )
The flag thing made me laugh - there's no wind on the moon, but when they moved the flag around you had resonance coming through the flagpole, which, in a near vacuum such as the moon, would cause exaggerated movement of the flag part.
I'm studying Astronomy as part of my Maths with astronomy degree - it's two thirds Maths and one third Astronomy, and my astronomy tutors has a funny way with socks and sandals roflmao
SuperBRAT - September 7, 2006 11:38 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 7 2006, 10:49 AM) |
| QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 6 2006, 10:44 PM) | | QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 6 2006, 09:54 AM) | | QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Sep 5 2006, 03:55 PM) | That's astronomers for you roflmao
The earth can fully rotate around the centre of the galaxy before they know what they're looking at roflmao |
Oi! Cheeky scamp! roflmao
When I am head of NASA and own 20 ferrari's, 15 homes, 5 luxury yachts and half of leicester, you'll have a different attitude then roflmao
|
Sure will! I will be your wife ;) roflmao
Are you an astronomer then? Do you REALLY belive they put men on the moon when Armstrong went? I don't. I think it was shot in Area 42 or whatever they call it liek the conspiracy theorists say. Was there also not a problem with the light and the way the flag blew, or didn't?
|
roflmao I remember watching that documentary on Channel 5 about that - I found it hilarious!
Man definitely landed on the moon, the thing that fuels these conspiracy theories most is of course the political reasons for going there by the Americans.
The best evidence is the moon rock they brought back - There are compounds in that that are not found anywhere on Earth, while at the same time there are also compounds in it that prove thgat the moon was formed by a collision between the Earth and another large object! roflmao
We actually got shown some rocks that the public don't get shown at the National Space Centre (or the beehive as leicester people call it roflmao )
The flag thing made me laugh - there's no wind on the moon, but when they moved the flag around you had resonance coming through the flagpole, which, in a near vacuum such as the moon, would cause exaggerated movement of the flag part.
I'm studying Astronomy as part of my Maths with astronomy degree - it's two thirds Maths and one third Astronomy, and my astronomy tutors has a funny way with socks and sandals roflmao
|
roflmao Oh I say, socks and sandals! roflmao That reminds me of the RE and geography teachers when I was at school. Very nerdy!
Sounds very interesting. Still not sure that I trust that the Americans went to the moon when they say they did though. :rolleyes: I'm dead sceptical me!
sir matchstickmen - September 8, 2006 09:12 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 8 2006, 12:38 AM) |
| QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 7 2006, 10:49 AM) | | QUOTE (SuperBRAT @ Sep 6 2006, 10:44 PM) | | QUOTE (sir matchstickmen @ Sep 6 2006, 09:54 AM) | | QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Sep 5 2006, 03:55 PM) | That's astronomers for you roflmao
The earth can fully rotate around the centre of the galaxy before they know what they're looking at roflmao |
Oi! Cheeky scamp! roflmao
When I am head of NASA and own 20 ferrari's, 15 homes, 5 luxury yachts and half of leicester, you'll have a different attitude then roflmao
|
Sure will! I will be your wife ;) roflmao
Are you an astronomer then? Do you REALLY belive they put men on the moon when Armstrong went? I don't. I think it was shot in Area 42 or whatever they call it liek the conspiracy theorists say. Was there also not a problem with the light and the way the flag blew, or didn't?
|
roflmao I remember watching that documentary on Channel 5 about that - I found it hilarious!
Man definitely landed on the moon, the thing that fuels these conspiracy theories most is of course the political reasons for going there by the Americans.
The best evidence is the moon rock they brought back - There are compounds in that that are not found anywhere on Earth, while at the same time there are also compounds in it that prove thgat the moon was formed by a collision between the Earth and another large object! roflmao
We actually got shown some rocks that the public don't get shown at the National Space Centre (or the beehive as leicester people call it roflmao )
The flag thing made me laugh - there's no wind on the moon, but when they moved the flag around you had resonance coming through the flagpole, which, in a near vacuum such as the moon, would cause exaggerated movement of the flag part.
I'm studying Astronomy as part of my Maths with astronomy degree - it's two thirds Maths and one third Astronomy, and my astronomy tutors has a funny way with socks and sandals roflmao
|
roflmao Oh I say, socks and sandals! roflmao That reminds me of the RE and geography teachers when I was at school. Very nerdy!
Sounds very interesting. Still not sure that I trust that the Americans went to the moon when they say they did though. :rolleyes: I'm dead sceptical me!
|
I can understand it SB - I can't say I trust Americans a lot of the time (although the ones on here are wonderful! :D)
As for the socks and sandals, well it's not the scariest thing in there! roflmao
In our astronomy lectures we have to go in with the core physics group - they outnumber us about 10 to 1! And to look at some of them... truly terrifying! Us mathematicians stick together when we're in with them, it's like a load of young wacky professors who have no social skills whatsoever! roflmao
The maths group is so different - we're all human! roflmao