View Full Version: Floyd Landis loses appeal

Tennis Forum - Centre Court (Free from Havoc) > Other Sports > Floyd Landis loses appeal



Title: Floyd Landis loses appeal


Dinky Jo - September 20, 2007 07:47 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
Landis loses appeal against ban 

Floyd Landis has lost his appeal against a ban imposed after he failed a drugs test at the 2006 Tour de France.

The American Arbitration Association (AAA) upheld the two-year suspension which will run until January 2009. Landis also forfeits his Tour title.

He was fighting a US Anti-Doping Agency (Usada) punishment after testing positive for synthetic testosterone.

The American has denied using drugs and alleged incompetence at the French laboratory which tested his sample.

Landis, 31, testified before a three-man panel in May, with his legal team claiming Usada's case against him was a "disaster".

He tested positive after his sensational win on the 17th stage of the 2006 Tour.

He got a highly qualified legal team who tried to baffle everybody with science and public relations, and in the end the facts stood up

Pat McQuaid, UCI president

Landis has one more avenue of appeal open to him - the Court of Arbitration for Sport based in Switzerland - and has a month to decide whether to do that.

"This ruling is a blow to athletes and cyclists everywhere," Landis said in a statement.

"For the Panel to find in favor of Usada when, with respect to so many issues, Usada did not manage to prove even the most basic parts of their case shows that this system is fundamentally flawed.

"I am innocent, and we proved I am innocent."

But Usada chief executive Travis Tygart said: "Today's ruling is a victory for all clean athletes and everyone who values fair and honest competition."

If Landis does not appeal, he will be the first person in the 105-year history of cycling's most famous event to lose the title because of a doping offence.

After the AAA's decision was announced, cycling's world governing body the UCI confirmed Spain's Oscar Pereiro, who finished runner-up to Landis, as the 2006 Tour winner.

"You never want to win a competition like that," said Pereiro. "But after a year and a half of all of this I'm just glad it's over."

Pat McQuaid, UCI president, said: "He (Landis) has been found guilty. It proves that the system works no matter who you are.

"We now await and see if he does appeal to CAS. It's not a great surprise considering how events have evolved.

"He got a highly qualified legal team who tried to baffle everybody with science and public relations, and in the end the facts stood up."


I'm really pleased by this news - I hope he just accepts this and doesn't take it to the CAS, although I suspect he will. The whole of this trial has been fairly disgraceful - especially the blackmailing of Greg Lemond :(


Tenez - September 20, 2007 09:56 PM (GMT)
I am very pleased to. Just a shame it takes a year and a half to come to this conclusion despite such obvious evidence.....and maybe with more money he could have got away with it.

I now think of Armstrong who for some reasons believed Landis Innocent and was convinced it was another French plot against them.

Dinky Jo - September 20, 2007 10:10 PM (GMT)
well, you've gotta say that the fact that he came up with about 4 different excuses when he was first caught suggests he was quite possibly lying through his teeth. then this french conspiracy crap was just insulting beyond belief. Then blackmailing Greg Lemond because Lemond admitted he had been abused by an uncle.... :shrug:

anyway, who watched the tour last year must have known he was guilty. the day before he tested positive he'd cracked, completely, and lost 10 minutes. the next day he suddenly manages to race away from the pack and re-gain that 10 minutes :unsure: it looked suspicious to me at the time.......

I suspect he'll take it to the CAS though - he's invested too much time and effort to not see it through to the end :shrug:

Tenez - September 20, 2007 10:20 PM (GMT)
Yes it looked so obvious he cheated the way he recovered that day. It just shows how powerful the drugs are. What we do not know is that he probably got druged in the previous stages as well but passed the labs fine. The need to make up for the big loss of the 16th stage forced his team to use bigger means.

Dinky Jo - September 21, 2007 08:51 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Tenez @ Sep 20 2007, 11:20 PM)
Yes it looked so obvious he cheated the way he recovered that day. It just shows how powerful the drugs are. What we do not know is that he probably got druged in the previous stages as well but passed the labs fine. The need to make up for the big loss of the 16th stage forced his team to use bigger means.

Yeah, it's interesting what seems to get past the testing. :shrug:

I'm starting to find that it's becoming quite obvious who is doping - watching this year's tour I was so convinced that the whole of the Astana team were doping - especially after that time trial where they got 3 out of the top 4 places. Lo and behold, 2 of those riders have since been done for blood doping :shrug:

I still don't understand why riders use someone else's blood - they must know they're going to get caught :shrug:




Hosted for free by InvisionFree