Title: BIGGEST THREE SLAM WONDERS?
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 10:47 PM (GMT)
I would have to say jennifer Capriati and Lindsay Davenport.
Big Al - October 27, 2006 10:51 PM (GMT)
:coffee:
Sorry, just woke up . :unsure:
SerenaW19 - October 27, 2006 10:51 PM (GMT)
You start the funniest threads roflmao
Well to be honest I can't really think of anyother three slam wonders
So im going to have to go with Jen and Linds :D
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 10:54 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Big Al @ Oct 27 2006, 04:51 PM) |
:coffee:
Sorry, just woke up . :unsure: |
??
ObL!v!0N - October 27, 2006 10:56 PM (GMT)
Sharapova and Clijsters together :devil:
LDF - October 27, 2006 10:56 PM (GMT)
I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 10:58 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) |
| I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
LDF - October 27, 2006 10:59 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) |
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 11:01 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
LDF - October 27, 2006 11:03 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) |
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
ObL!v!0N - October 27, 2006 11:04 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 11:03 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
Oh, I thought it was coz they only achieved one thing, so you are a 'wonder' in that sense
SerenaW19 - October 27, 2006 11:04 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:01 PM) |
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
It's quite a lot really when you consider the amount of players that have never won a slam and also the amount that have got to finals but still never won...or players that have only won a single slam in their entire career.
There aren't that many people really with more than three slams...
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 11:05 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:03 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
But considering they spent a lot of their career at the top, in the cases of jen and lindsay, it's not that much. I mean, epople say how Margaret Court won Wimbledon ONLY three times.
chokapova - October 27, 2006 11:06 PM (GMT)
Winning 3 Slams is a very good achievement but I think winning 5 or more is much more of an achievement! :bow:
SerenaW19 - October 27, 2006 11:07 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (chokapova @ Oct 27 2006, 11:06 PM) |
| Winning 3 Slams is a very good achievement but I think winning 5 or more is much more of an achievement! :bow: |
Obviously, and winning 6 is even more of an achievement...
ObL!v!0N - October 27, 2006 11:07 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (chokapova @ Oct 27 2006, 11:06 PM) |
| Winning 3 Slams is a very good achievement but I think winning 5 or more is much more of an achievement! :bow: |
Yeah, Hingis :bow: :bow:
LDF - October 27, 2006 11:08 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:05 AM) |
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:03 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
But considering they spent a lot of their career at the top, in the cases of jen and lindsay, it's not that much. I mean, epople say how Margaret Court won Wimbledon ONLY three times.
|
You could call them underachievers then ;)
chokapova - October 27, 2006 11:08 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 05:04 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:01 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
It's quite a lot really when you consider the amount of players that have never won a slam and also the amount that have got to finals but still never won...or players that have only won a single slam in their entire career.
There aren't that many people really with more than three slams...
|
Well in the last 10 years players who were active in singleswith more than 3 include:
Graf
Seles
Serena
Justine
Hingis
Venus
Sanchez-Vicario
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 11:08 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:05 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:03 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
But considering they spent a lot of their career at the top, in the cases of jen and lindsay, it's not that much. I mean, epople say how Margaret Court won Wimbledon ONLY three times.
|
You could call them underachievers then ;)
|
Alright then, I'll change th thread to 2 Slams. :)
chokapova - October 27, 2006 11:09 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 05:07 PM) |
| QUOTE (chokapova @ Oct 27 2006, 11:06 PM) | | Winning 3 Slams is a very good achievement but I think winning 5 or more is much more of an achievement! :bow: |
Obviously, and winning 6 is even more of an achievement...
|
And winning more than 20 is even better :bow:
Go Steffi :yahoo:
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 11:10 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) |
| QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:05 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:03 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
But considering they spent a lot of their career at the top, in the cases of jen and lindsay, it's not that much. I mean, epople say how Margaret Court won Wimbledon ONLY three times.
|
You could call them underachievers then ;)
|
Alright then, I'll change th thread to 2 Slams. :)
|
I can't , I've realied. Well, anyway, just change it to
THE BIGGEST TWO SLAM WONDERS.
Mary Pierce, Amle Mauresmo, Fred Stolle.
ObL!v!0N - October 27, 2006 11:10 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (chokapova @ Oct 27 2006, 11:09 PM) |
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 05:07 PM) | | QUOTE (chokapova @ Oct 27 2006, 11:06 PM) | | Winning 3 Slams is a very good achievement but I think winning 5 or more is much more of an achievement! :bow: |
Obviously, and winning 6 is even more of an achievement...
|
And winning more than 20 is even better :bow:
Go Steffi :yahoo:
|
and Navratamoanalot :rolleyes:
ObL!v!0N - October 27, 2006 11:10 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:10 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:05 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:03 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
But considering they spent a lot of their career at the top, in the cases of jen and lindsay, it's not that much. I mean, epople say how Margaret Court won Wimbledon ONLY three times.
|
You could call them underachievers then ;)
|
Alright then, I'll change th thread to 2 Slams. :)
|
I can't , I've realied. Well, anyway, just change it to
THE BIGGEST TWO SLAM WONDERS.
Mary Pierce, Amle Mauresmo, Fred Stolle.
|
Sharapova :whistle:
The Dav - October 27, 2006 11:11 PM (GMT)
Of all the professional tennis players, only a very small group have won 3, that's a pretty awesome achievement :rolleyes:
SerenaW19 - October 27, 2006 11:11 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (chokapova @ Oct 27 2006, 11:08 PM) |
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 05:04 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:01 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
It's quite a lot really when you consider the amount of players that have never won a slam and also the amount that have got to finals but still never won...or players that have only won a single slam in their entire career.
There aren't that many people really with more than three slams...
|
Well in the last 10 years players who were active in singleswith more than 3 include:
Graf
Seles
Serena
Justine
Hingis
Venus
Sanchez-Vicario
|
Ye there have been quite a lot in the last ten years but when you go back to the beginning of Grand Slams I still doubt there are more than 20 with 3+ slams.
Considering the 10,000s of pro tennis players over the decades, having three slams still puts them in quite an elite group. Which is why I wouldn't dub their slams "wonders."
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 11:11 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 05:10 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:05 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:03 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
But considering they spent a lot of their career at the top, in the cases of jen and lindsay, it's not that much. I mean, epople say how Margaret Court won Wimbledon ONLY three times.
|
You could call them underachievers then ;)
|
Alright then, I'll change th thread to 2 Slams. :)
|
I can't , I've realied. Well, anyway, just change it to
THE BIGGEST TWO SLAM WONDERS.
Mary Pierce, Amle Mauresmo, Fred Stolle.
|
Oh, and of course Lleyton Hewitt and Marat Safin.
SerenaW19 - October 27, 2006 11:12 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:10 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:05 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:03 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
But considering they spent a lot of their career at the top, in the cases of jen and lindsay, it's not that much. I mean, epople say how Margaret Court won Wimbledon ONLY three times.
|
You could call them underachievers then ;)
|
Alright then, I'll change th thread to 2 Slams. :)
|
I can't , I've realied. Well, anyway, just change it to
THE BIGGEST TWO SLAM WONDERS.
Mary Pierce, Amle Mauresmo, Fred Stolle.
|
What's the point though... :shrug:
The coined phrase is one slam wonder.
ObL!v!0N - October 27, 2006 11:12 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:11 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 05:10 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:05 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:03 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
But considering they spent a lot of their career at the top, in the cases of jen and lindsay, it's not that much. I mean, epople say how Margaret Court won Wimbledon ONLY three times.
|
You could call them underachievers then ;)
|
Alright then, I'll change th thread to 2 Slams. :)
|
I can't , I've realied. Well, anyway, just change it to
THE BIGGEST TWO SLAM WONDERS.
Mary Pierce, Amle Mauresmo, Fred Stolle.
|
Oh, and of course Lleyton Hewitt and Marat Safin.
|
Sharapova too
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 11:13 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ObL!v!0N @ Oct 27 2006, 05:10 PM) |
| QUOTE (chokapova @ Oct 27 2006, 11:09 PM) | | QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 05:07 PM) | | QUOTE (chokapova @ Oct 27 2006, 11:06 PM) | | Winning 3 Slams is a very good achievement but I think winning 5 or more is much more of an achievement! :bow: |
Obviously, and winning 6 is even more of an achievement...
|
And winning more than 20 is even better :bow:
Go Steffi :yahoo:
|
and Navratamoanalot :rolleyes:
|
And maragaret court, 24!! :clap:
SerenaW19 - October 27, 2006 11:15 PM (GMT)
Apart from Nav 'only' has 18.
ObL!v!0N - October 27, 2006 11:15 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 11:15 PM) |
| Apart from Nav 'only' has 18. |
I thought she had 20+ :huh:
chokapova - October 27, 2006 11:16 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 05:11 PM) |
| QUOTE (chokapova @ Oct 27 2006, 11:08 PM) | | QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 05:04 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:01 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
It's quite a lot really when you consider the amount of players that have never won a slam and also the amount that have got to finals but still never won...or players that have only won a single slam in their entire career.
There aren't that many people really with more than three slams...
|
Well in the last 10 years players who were active in singleswith more than 3 include:
Graf
Seles
Serena
Justine
Hingis
Venus
Sanchez-Vicario
|
Ye there have been quite a lot in the last ten years but when you go back to the beginning of Grand Slams I still doubt there are more than 20 with 3+ slams.
Considering the 10,000s of pro tennis players over the decades, having three slams still puts them in quite an elite group. Which is why I wouldn't dub their slams "wonders."
|
Yeah I think you are right, to win 3 Slams is pretty good going and if you have won at 3 or more different slams, that's even better! :D
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 11:17 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 05:12 PM) |
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:10 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:08 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:05 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 05:03 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:01 AM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:59 PM) | | QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 27 2006, 11:58 PM) | | QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27 2006, 04:56 PM) | | I'm sorry, a 3 Slam wonder? :blink: roflmao |
What's so weird about a three slam wonder? Plese explain.
|
You're not exactly a 'wonder' if you win three Slams :shrug:
|
But it means that in their entire career, they only won 3 Slams.
|
...which is a superb achievement. :shrug:
You call someone a 'one-Slam wonder' because they've never built on that; you 'wonder' how they actually won that Slam, hence the name.
|
But considering they spent a lot of their career at the top, in the cases of jen and lindsay, it's not that much. I mean, epople say how Margaret Court won Wimbledon ONLY three times.
|
You could call them underachievers then ;)
|
Alright then, I'll change th thread to 2 Slams. :)
|
I can't , I've realied. Well, anyway, just change it to
THE BIGGEST TWO SLAM WONDERS.
Mary Pierce, Amle Mauresmo, Fred Stolle.
|
What's the point though... :shrug:
The coined phrase is one slam wonder.
|
2 slam wonders as just as surprosing IMO.
ObL!v!0N - October 27, 2006 11:17 PM (GMT)
Selesfan - October 27, 2006 11:17 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ObL!v!0N @ Oct 27 2006, 05:15 PM) |
| QUOTE (SerenaW19 @ Oct 27 2006, 11:15 PM) | | Apart from Nav 'only' has 18. |
I thought she had 20+ :huh:
|
No, her and Chrissie both have 18.
Brakkus - October 28, 2006 06:23 AM (GMT)
I loved this thread,great stuff. roflmao
Selesfan - October 28, 2006 06:36 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Brakkus @ Oct 28 2006, 12:23 AM) |
| I loved this thread,great stuff. roflmao |
What's so funny about this thread?
dl04 - October 28, 2006 09:06 AM (GMT)
SF :rolleyes: roflmao
You say Magaret Court only won Wimby 3 times, but she won 24 GS singles titles and 62 in total :lol:
You cant call 3 time GS champions underachievers or 3 slam wonders( :lol:), its just bizarre :wacko: roflmao
Selesfan - October 28, 2006 12:59 PM (GMT)
Well I personally feel that selesdavenportfan raises a good point here. We never discuss three slam wonders.
SerenaW19 - October 28, 2006 01:14 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (selesdavenportfan @ Oct 28 2006, 12:59 PM) |
| Well I personally feel that selesdavenportfan raises a good point here. We never discuss three slam wonders. |
roflmao
So you think you raise a good point :rolleyes:
We hardly ever discuss three slam wonders; as we generally just assume all three slam wonders are brilliant players, happy with the fact they are a comfortable multi-grand slam winner.