Are these sentences grammatical? And if not, could you rewrite for me or explain what wrong inside is? Please ^_^

His disclaim and answers were not in parallelism and were filled with repetition, it may conflict the law.
My professor was sued for disturbance by spreading copy of repetition of his student’s issue.
I cannot bear his learning way in learning arithmetic with ceaseless repetition.

I am having a hard time understanding them. Here is how I would structure the first sentence:

His disclaim and answers were not in parallelism and were filled with repetition, which might conflict with the law.

I am not sure what you meant in the second sentence. Did you mean disturbance or distribution? And the third is a bit hard to comprehend as well. Can you show me the context in which these sentences are being used?